A while back I experienced the sublime joy
and pleasant challenge that comes from building a craftsman kit.
This was no ordinary kit – it was an HO scale model of an HO scale
model – a 'tribute' kit to a box car skillfully built and
whimsically lettered by John Allen of Gorre & Daphetid fame. Not
only that, but this car is a throwback to earlier kit
construction methods; it was made primarily of paper.
Though the car
ends, sides, roof and even the inner structure are made of paper, they
were laser cut and printed. The underframe is cast resin, and details
(the ones that weren't paper) are from Tichy and Grandt Line. That
means full underbody detail with all the fiddly bits. Couplers?
Kadee scale size, naturally. Trucks? Tichy arch bar.
And another thing – this kit is now
out of production and the manufacturer, sadly, out of business. The
car I built is a 'Superior Detritus' box car offered by Full Circle
Models. John Allen's original was a Central Valley box car kit. My
kit was lettered (and weathered!) by computer. John's was lettered
by hand. Right-click and open this image in a new window for a REALLY big version:
All this prompted me to ask, “Just
what is 'vintage' anymore”? For example, is this piece of rolling
stock, 'vintage'? If you define vintage as 'old', then the answer is
no. After all, the kit is only a few years old. But if you didn't know
how old it was, would it have that 'vintage' look? How does a model
railroader define 'vintage'?
Webster's listing for the word vintage
includes three relevant definitions:
- a collection of contemporaneous and similar persons or things
- a period of origin or manufacture
- length of existence
Even so, isn't this really dodging the
question or escaping on a technicality? I get the feeling that
'vintage', to many modelers, represents that 'golden' era of
American-made craftsman kits. You know, the ones that came with a
tube of glue bearing the same name as the kit box, or similar boxes
of wood and metal parts with printed car sides or decals to apply.
Couplers? Take your pick – after all, you had to supply them.
Trucks? If you were lucky they 'snapped' onto the bolster. These
were kits from the 'vintage' era of model railroading, surely.
I love those kits, (even though I am
1975 vintage, myself), and the Detritus car almost fits this
definition also, doesn't it? It is no 'shake the box' kit. Though
laser cut, it required a great deal of patience, time and
craftsmanship to assemble. It is in fact, a model of a model built
in that 'vintage' era. So my car is a 2010 vintage kit, representing
a late 1800's vintage box car, based on a 1950's vintage model, built
using a mix of 'vintage' and modern techniques. Whew! I'd say it's
vintage all around, wouldn't you?
Vintage Detritus is indeed Superior Detritus :-)
ReplyDeleteInteresting question. In my personal lexicon I don't use vintage much. Maybe only when the subject of wine comes up. I find I use 'retro' a lot when I write about things from another era. But, looking at some online definitions it looks like I'm using it incorrectly because they say retro is 'imitative or consciously derivative of a style, fashion, music, trends, design or attitudes of the recent past'. So, something that is physically new or recent, could be termed 'retro' if it was deliberately made to imitate something from the past. I will often slip and look at the original old thing and call it retro, when I should only be using retro to talk about new instances of the old thing. So, I guess the old thing itself is vintage, and the new instances are retro.
But, retro or vintage, I like your boxcar. It looks great.
Jim, That is a really useful distinction with a difference! I did not realize that 'retro' is a designation for an imitation but gosh it makes sense. My kit then, has that retro John Allen look. Cool.
ReplyDelete